It might be scary to get arrested for DUI especially if you don’t know what to do when you’re already there. If I will be stopped for DUI suspicion here in Houston, Texas, do I have to answer the officer’s questions and can I refuse a search of my vehicle?

Madisen

Houston, TX

If you will be stopped for DUI suspicion in Houston, Texas, the first thing that the police officer would do is to ask for your license and registration. At some point after the officer do that, he/she will ask you if you have consumed any alcoholic beverages. It would be perfectly within your legal rights to politely refuse to answer the questions. The police officer could still decide that he/she has enough reason to arrest you, but simply refusing to answer the question is not reason enough. But the downside in refusing to answer the officer’s questions is that you would look suspicious, that is why, if you have not had anything to drink, the best idea is usually to simply say so.

Regarding your question on refusing a search of your vehicle, you have the legal right to do so. The officer could not arrest you simply for refusing to consent to a search of your vehicle. But in some limited cases, your car can be searched without your permission or a warrant so long as the officer has probable cause to believe that you have committed a crime. Do not resist even though you think that what the officer is doing is illegal. It could not be used at trial if the officer illegally obtains evidence against you.

My daughter has been arrested for drunk driving in Houston, Texas. She was asked to perform field sobriety tests and she failed them. I was told that these tests do not accurately determine driver impairment. Can she use this as a defense?

Madison

Houston, TX

Yes, it’s true, field sobriety tests (FST’s) do not accurately measure the driver impairment for probable cause to support an arrest for DUI. So your daughter can use that as a defense in her DUI case in Houston, Texas. Many researchers observed that FST’s determine balance, reaction time and steadiness but concluded that a connection between these factors and driving ability was not apparent. That’s because neither a simple movement time nor steady stance is essential to the safe operation of a motor vehicle. The researchers conceded that FST’s may show the presence of alcohol but did not necessarily measure driving ability.

In general, police officers do not give the FST’s uniformly and there is no scientific basis for assuming these tests are valid. Many of these officers either improperly instruct the suspect driver on how to perform the tests or administer the wrong tests. A DUI defense lawyer can obtain a pre-trial suppression ruling to exclude the FSTs and their alleged indication of impairment due to lack of improper instructions and scientific foundation.