Reader’s Question:

I just recently had the arraignment of my DUI case here in Houston, Texas and I pleaded not guilty so the case will continue. Would all be the evidence against me on my drunk driving arrest automatically be admissible in court?

Grant

Houston, TX

When the prosecution begin to prepare their DUI case against you in Houston, Texas, they start by collecting all the evidence that supports their claim that you were really driving under the influence. But just because the prosecutors have collected it and want to present it at trial does not mean that it is automatically admissible. There are actually strict legal requirements that determine whether a piece of evidence can be presented at trial. A very important part of making your DUI case is arguing that the evidence that the prosecution wants to present at trial does not meet these requirements and therefore cannot be used against you.

Your DUI lawyer can formally request for motion to suppress to ask the court to exclude certain evidence from a trial because it was obtained illegally or improperly by the police officer. An example is that your DUI lawyer can argue that the officer did not have probable cause to pull you over. Suppression motion would argue that the officer’s belief that you were drunk driving was not “reasonable.” That means that the officer’s justification for your DUI stop should be something he actually saw. If motion to suppress will be successful, all the evidence that was made possible by pulling you over can also be suppressed.